Learning activities: examples aligned to the Southern Cross Model v2
Learning activities guide students and provide them with the opportunity to process, integrate and understand unit materials (e.g. watching videos, listening to podcasts, and reading articles).
Whatever activity you choose should relate directly to the previous content. Ideally, all activities should:
- build a community
- clearly outline unit expectations
- utilise online tools for interaction
- promote the exchange of ideas
- provide timely and relevant feedback
- create an environment that is student-centred (Poll and Weller 2014) full reference needed.
The following example activities are categorised based on the student engagement focus and the Community of Enquiry Model (Col) element that best characterises them.
(icon) Activities that Engage with Content
Engagement with Content is characterised by activities where students move from understanding and clarifying a problem or issue through to exploration, integration and application.
Content Focus
Face to face
Engage learners in a simulated activity such as a paired role play in order for learners to apply and consolidate course content.
Online
Problem-Solving
Face to face
Online
Practice
Face to face
Online
Acquisition
Face to face
Online
(icon) Activities that Engage with Participants
Engagement with participants is characterised by activities where students engage with others, provide self-disclosure, express agreement or debate, refer to other individuals by name, and ask questions.
Interactivity Focus
Face to face
Tutorial Activity Jigsaw Readings:
This activity allows learners to build social connections and support each others' learning through by analysing ideas and concepts within readings and sharing their findings.
It is suitable for both face-to-face, blended and online learning. In addition, jigsaw readings activities make readings more engaging, accessible and much quicker for students.
Learners read different paragraphs with questions that correspond with the identified page numbers in each paper. The jigsaw readings come together as a whole article in follow up tutorials where learners take notes of each other's findings.
Ensure you provide clear instructions.
Example activity instructions:
- Find a partner for your Jigsaw reading partnership.
- Gold Coast students paired up with a fellow student in class on Tuesday, so work with your partner.
- Online students can pair up with one of their fellow online students on the ‘Jigsaw Reading Activity' discussion board forum or work on their own independently.
- If you decide to work independently, on the discussion board, please notify your fellow online students which reading and pages you have chosen so we don't have the whole class doing the same reading.
- On your own or with your jigsaw partner, choose either Ozlem Sensoy & Robin DiAngelo (2017), Jodi O’Brien (2017) or Mark Mckenna, (2018).
- Each person individually focuses on either the first or second half of their chosen paper and addresses the corresponding questions.
- In other words, you only read and answer the questions that correspond with the pages you have chosen to analyse individually.
Online
Inquiry
Face to face
Online
Discussions and Debates
Face to face
Online
(icon) Activities that Engage with Goals/Direction
Engagement with Goals/Direction is characterised by activities that directly support student success, provide responsive feedback, address misconceptions, and resolve student problems and questions.
Critical thinking
Face to face
Online
Reflection
Face to face
Online
Could combine these two into a column
Production (creation)
Face to face
Online
Activities that contribute towards a community of inquiry
These activities provide opportunities for student interaction and community-building, leading to enhanced satisfaction, engagement, belonging and persistence. Read more about the Community of Inquiry Framework.
References
Anderson, L., Krathwohl, D., Airasian, P., Cruikshank, K., Mayer, R., Pintrich, P., Raths, J. & Wittrock, M. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Allyn & Bacon. Boston, MA (Pearson Education Group)
Armstrong, P. (2010). Bloom’s Taxonomy. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching. https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/blooms-taxonomy/.
Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. (n.d.). Iowa State University. https://www.celt.iastate.edu/teaching/effective-teaching-practices/revised-blooms-taxonomy/
Problem solving - branching scenario
LEGL1004-2023-T3 Australian Legal System Unit Summary Activity: branching scenario
This is a revision activity asks students to review the process of changing an Act. It is located at the end of the Unit in a 'Unit Summary' folder below a short video and a list of focus topics. Branching scenarios allow students to test their knowledge in through by solving problems in simulated environments.
The following instructions precede the activity:
To conclude your studies in this unit, you may want to attempt this final game-like branching scenario, to test your knowledge of how one can approach the process of changing the law. The scenario will involve knowledge you have developed over different Modules and Topics. This scenario can be attempted multiple times and is not assessed.
laws2055
Problem question - documentation tool
LAWS2009-2023-T3 Topic 2.2 Activity: Fault Elements of Manslaughter
Activity, unit (link?), context, tool, aim.
Reflection activity - image hotspot
This is an H5P hotspot activity designed to encourage students to understand and reflect on the role of a historian.
Learning activity - image hotspot with links
This H5P hotspot activity introduces students to different virus types by providing them with a visual image of the viruses, basic information defining them, and links to further information about each virus.
Revision questions - interactive book
This activity revises the topic 'Introduction to the chemical level of organisation' an is preceded by a brief introduction and followed by a brief summary of the topic. The H5P interactive book starts with an interactive video with true/false questions and students then need to complete a number of interactive revision activities to check their knowledge. Feed back is provided at each stage.
Activity, unit (link?), context, tool, aim.
Workshop and tutorial group discussions
CLST3002-2023-T1 Borderlands: Identity, Culture and Belonging Module 3 Activity: Workshop and tutorial material
This is an example of a blended activity where students first engage with the self-access content online (either a video, a reading, or some questions). In this case the focus is on four activities from an online module. Then during the workshop and tutorial, students are organised into groups and invited to reflect on and share their opinions about the topics raised in the self-access activities.
For example:
Activity 3.3: Watch the video ‘Don't go Small. Go Australia Campaign'.
Tutorial discussion topic: Apply the term ‘nationing' to the Australia Tourism advertisement and explain how Australian culture is produced and whether Australian cultural stereotypes are evident.
Problem solving - branching scenario
nurs2013 hypoglycaemia branching scenario
Activity, unit (link?), context, tool, aim.
Revision activity - drag and drop
This H5P drag and drop activity requires students to match the anatomical terms and descriptions correctly. Feedback is provided once students submit their responses.
Activity, unit (link?), context, tool, aim.
Activity, unit (link?), context, tool, aim.
Activity, unit (link?), context, tool, aim.
Reflection activity - H5P Essay
This reflective activity requires students to reflect on
Reflection activity - H5P Documentation tool
Th
Activity, unit (link?), context, tool, aim.