Types of rubrics

This article discusses the types of rubrics used to grade student assessments at Southern Cross University. 

More about rubrics

For more information about what rubrics are, and how they are used at Southern Cross University please see the following article: Rubrics

The following rubric examples are based on the Recommendations and guidance for writing rubrics approved by the Teaching and Learning Assessment Committee (TAC) and ratified in May 2023. 

Be aware that;

  • these examples have been modified, summarised or adapted to suit the purpose of this article
  • the Turnitin rubric columns; "HD+" and "Not Addressed" have been removed from these examples to save space. See Creating a Turnitin rubric for more detailed information about using these columns.
  • these examples were designed for a specific unit assessment, and will require modification to align with different learning outcomes or unit contexts.

Types of rubrics 

There are two types of rubrics commonly used at Southern Cross University – holistic and analytic. 

Holistic 

Analytic 

Holistic rubrics are best used when making an overall or holistic judgement about the quality of the response by considering all the criteria together. 

Analytic rubrics are best used when making judgements about each criterion separately, then weighting and combining each judgement to make an overall decision on the quality of the response. 

Holistic rubrics 

In holistic rubrics, each standard is articulated by a single, detailed, descriptive statement. Holistic rubrics are used when it is more difficult or not desirable to partition a task into separate criteria.

For example, in some tasks, the criteria are intertwined and overlap too much. This often occurs in complex, extended abstract or creative tasks where there are a variety of ways to go about the task and the task cannot easily be partitioned into components. In such cases, we make holistic judgments about the work, rather than analytical judgments based on individual criteria. 

Alternatively, where an assessment task is focused around demonstrating only one particular unit learning outcome (ULO), there may be marking efficiencies in using a holistic rubric to assess multiple criteria.

Holistic rubrics are particularly ideal for oral presentations or creative performances, but may be appropriate for other assessment types including multi-media projects or portfolios.


Holistic rubric example

The following example was developed for a ten-minute recorded presentation task in an Oceanography unit. Students were asked to explain the behaviour of a major ion in the ocean and the interaction between geology (the marine ecosystem type) and the biological (primary productivity) cycle. Note how the two unit learning outcomes are closely interrelated to each other and assessed together in the rubric for this task.

The Unit Learning Outcome (ULOs) for this assessment were;

  1. Explain the behaviour of major and minor ion composition in seawater and their interaction with geological and biological cycles.
  2. Demonstrate a clear understanding of the interactions of physics, chemistry and biology in shaping the ocean.


Analytic rubric for an oral presentation in an Oceanography unit

SCU Grade Descriptors 

Description of Grade 

High Distinction
85% - 100%

Presentation has a creative introduction that catches the audience’s attention and the conclusion concisely summarises the interactions. Comprehensive but succinct explanation about the behaviour of major and minor ions in seawater and their impact on a range of different marine habitats, from a physical, biological and chemical oceanography perspective. The presentation engages and sustains audiences’ interest with the use of highly effective presentation techniques (e.g. pitch, volume, pace of voice). References have been incorporated logically and insightfully, with accurate documentation that meets APA7. 

Distinction
75% - 84%

Presentation has a well-developed introduction that catches the audience’s attention and the conclusion outlines the interactions. Detailed explanation about the behaviour of major and minor ions in seawater and their impact on at least three (3) different marine habitats, from a physical, biological and chemical oceanography perspective. The presentation engages audiences’ interest. References are used logically, proficiently and are accurately documented following APA7, with one or two minor errors. 

Credit
65% - 74%

Presentation considers the audience and has a clear introduction and conclusion that restates the interactions. Clear explanation about the behaviour of major and minor ions in seawater and their impact on three (3) different marine habitats, from a physical, biological and chemical oceanography perspective. The presentation is easy to follow and somewhat engaging. References are appropriately incorporated and most are correctly documented using APA7.

Pass
50% - 64%

Presentation targets the general audience and the introduction and conclusion are related to the topic.  Demonstrates a working understanding about the behaviour of major and minor ions in seawater and their impact on at least two (2) different marine habitats, from a physical, biological and chemical oceanography perspective. The presentation is disjointed in some parts. References require better incorporation, but generally meet the requirements of APA7. 

Marginal Fail
35% - 49%

Presentation needs more development and the audience is not appropriately addressed. Introduction and conclusion are ineffective with no use of transitions. Unclear explanation about the behaviour of major and minor ions in seawater and their impact on different marine habitats, from a physical, biological and chemical oceanography perspective.  The presentation can be difficult to follow and requires better structure. References inappropriate or unclear and require more accurate documentation to meet the requirements of APA7. 

Fail
0% - 34%

Presentation doesn’t consider the audience and lacks a logical plan, introduction or conclusion. Does not explain the behaviour of major and minor ions in seawater, or their impact different marine habitats, from a physical, biological and chemical oceanography perspective and includes irrelevant information. The presentation is hard to understand and has no clear structure. References have not be included and/or do not follow the APA7 standard. 


Analytic rubrics

Analytic rubrics are used when the judgment of the assessment task can be partitioned into criteria, each of which are assessed individually. The results for each criterion are then aggregated to provide an overall grade for the task. Criteria may be weighted relative to their importance to achieving the learning outcomes for the assessment task.

Analytic Rubric example

The following rubric was developed for a physics unit where students were required to explain a basic physics principle, how it applies in various fields, and inspires emerging trends through a 5-minute presentation.
 
The Unit Learning Outcomes (ULOs) for this assessment were;

  1. Demonstrate an understanding of basic concepts of motions, waves and mechanics across various fields of application.
  2. Communicate how properties of motions, waves and mechanics are used to inspire emerging trends across various fields of application.


Analytic rubric for a physics presentation in a physics unit

CriteriaHigh Distinction
85% - 100%
Distinction
75% - 84%
Credit
65% - 74%
Pass
50% - 64%
Marginal Fail
35%-49%
Fail
0%-34%

Demonstrates knowledge of the selected fundamental principle of physics. (ULO1)

30%

Clearly and comprehensively explains the physics principle using an extensive range of real-world applications across various fields. Expertly integrates scientific terminology and demonstrates a high level of expertise.

Effectively explains the physics principle using detailed real-world applications across various fields. Effectively incorporates scientific terminology and demonstrates a strong understanding of the subject matter.

Clearly explains the physics principle using real-world examples, some areas may lack depth. Appropriately incorporates scientific terminology and concepts.

Adequate explanation of the physics principle with limited depth. Real-world applications are mentioned, but their connection to various fields lacks specificity. Scientific terminology and concepts are included, minor inaccuracies or omissions may exist.

Limited overview of the physics principle lacking detail and clarity. Real-world applications are mentioned, but their connection to fields is unclear. Limited use of scientific terminology and concepts, includes inaccuracies or misconceptions.

Superficial or unclear explanation of the physics principle. Limited or no real-world applications are mentioned.  Scientific terminology and concepts are missing.

Discusses how the selected principle of physics is applied to create emerging technology of interest. (ULO2)

40%

Demonstrates a comprehensive and insightful understanding of how the principle is integrated into an emerging technology.

Clearly and persuasively explains technical and conceptual connections between the principle and applications to the emerging technology, using appropriate varied examples and evidence.

Demonstrates a well-developed understanding of how the principle is relevant to an emerging technology.

Provides a clear and relevant explanation of the relationship between the principle and emerging technology, with supporting examples and evidence.

Demonstrates a clear understanding of how the principle contributes to an emerging technology.

Describes connections between the physics principle and emerging technology factually, using examples and evidence.


Demonstrates a working understanding of how the principle contributes to an emerging technology.

Connects the physics principle to emerging technology using at least one basic example and evidence.

Demonstrates a superficial understanding of how the principle contributes to an emerging technology.

Limited description of how the physics principle connects to emerging technology. Example/s and evidence are unclear.

Demonstrates a poor understanding of how the principle relates to an emerging technology.

Does not explain how the physics principle connects to an emerging technology, and/or provides irrelevant examples and misunderstands evidence.

Communicates properties of motions, waves, and mechanics to a non-expert audience. (ULO2)

20%

Seamlessly conveys complex concepts to a non-expert audience with exceptional clarity, precision, and creativity. Effectively uses appropriate examples, analogies, and visual aids to illustrate complex concepts.

Demonstrates exceptional skill in adapting language and style to suit the audience and purpose of the presentation.

Conveys complex concepts to a non-expert audience, demonstrating a high level of clarity and accuracy. Uses appropriate examples, analogies, and visual aids to illustrate complex concepts.

Demonstrates skill in adapting language and style to suit the audience and purpose of the presentation.

Conveys complex concepts to a non-expert audience clearly. Uses mostly helpful examples, analogies, or visual aids to illustrate complex concepts.

Adapts language and style to suit the audience and purpose of the presentation, with some minor lapses.

Generally, conveys complex concepts to a non-expert audience. Uses some examples, analogies, or visual aids to illustrate complex concepts.

Generally adapts language and style to suit the audience and purpose of the presentation, with lapses at times.

Relays complex concepts with limited clarity and effectiveness. Uses few or inappropriate examples, analogies, or visual aids to illustrate complex concepts.

Adapts some of the language or style to suit the audience and purpose of the presentation but there are notable gaps in the delivery.

Inadequately explains complex concepts, lacking clarity and coherence. Missing appropriate examples, analogies, or visual aids to illustrate complex concepts.

Communication is inappropriate for the audience and purpose of the presentation.

Supporting evidence and academic integrity 
(ULO1)

10%

Correctly and consistently uses a variety of highly relevant sources to support arguments and ideas.

Always adheres to referencing conventions, consistently demonstrates an outstanding ability to integrate sources into the work in a seamless and sophisticated way.

Uses a range of relevant sources to support arguments and ideas.

Adheres to referencing conventions with a high degree of accuracy, demonstrates the ability to always integrate sources into the work effectively.

Uses mostly relevant sources to support arguments and ideas.

Adheres to referencing conventions with minor lapses, demonstrates the ability to integrate sources into the work appropriately.

Uses a few relevant sources to support arguments and ideas.

Follows referencing conventions with few errors, demonstrates the ability to integrate sources into the work correctly.

Limited use of relevant sources to support arguments and ideas.

Attempts to follow referencing conventions with many omissions or errors, demonstrates a limited ability to integrate sources into the work correctly.

Relevant sources have not been used to support arguments and ideas.

Referencing conventions not followed, sources integrated into the work not listed.

Advantages and disadvantages

The table below provides a comparison between analytic and holistic rubrics, and includes suggested uses for each rubric type. 

 

Holistic 

Analytic 

Advantages 

  • Suit small, simple assessment tasks with few interrelated criteria or a single unit learning outcome (ULO)
  • Useful for assessing higher-order, interrelated skills, and knowledge 
  • Useful for tasks that are holistic in nature e.g. works of art, creative writing, engineering design, projects 
  • May be more authentic in nature 
  • Can be quicker to develop 
  • Suits large complex tasks with multiple discreet criteria and unit learning outcomes (ULOs)
  • Useful when assessing discrete skills and knowledge 
  • Provides direct feedback on set criteria and specific strengths and weaknesses 
  • Easier to moderate marking in large classes with a large number of markers

Disadvantages 

  • More difficult to moderate in large classes with a large number of markers 
  • Provides less detailed feedback 
  • Can produce a biased result if markers are not clear on what is required 
  • Difficult to determine whether multiple, discrete learning outcomes have been achieved 
  • Too many criteria can over-partition a task so that the result is biased towards small skills 
  • Can produce a biased result - where criteria are not carefully selected or weighted 
  • Can focus on detailed, lower-level skills rather than deeper understanding and knowledge 
  • Can take more time to develop

Appropriate Assessment tasks

Oral presentations, creative performances, short blog entries/discussion board posts, portfolios, and multimedia projects. 

Essays, lab reports, prac reports, literature reviews, case studies, reflective journals, and annotated bibliographies. 


(Please note - it's better to refer to the Online version rather than export, as it's always up to date)